Resource logo with tagline

Exclusive: Methanol electrolyzer start-up gearing up for seed capital raise

An early-stage technology company seeking to commercialize an electrolyzer that produces methanol from CO2 at ambient temperature and pressure is preparing its first capital raise.

Oxylus Energy, a methanol technology and project development start-up, is preparing to kick off its first capital raise later this month.

The Yale-based firm is seeking to raise $4m in seed funding, with proceeds funding the advancement of a production-scale CO2-to-methanol electrolyzer cell and its first commercial agreements for offtake, CEO Perry Bakas said in an interview.

Oxylus aims to commercialize an electrolyzer that creates methanol from CO2 at room temperature and pressure, and also plans to develop and operate its own methanol production plants, he said.

The technology, which will scale to larger versions in coming years, recently hit a key milestone with the validation of a 5cm2 platform.

The seed capital raise would provide approximately 26 months of runway, according to Bakas. The company would then raise between $20 – $30m in a follow-on Series A in late 2026.

“What we’re gonna do with the Series A is put that first electrolyzer into the ground,” he said. “It’ll be our first revenue-producing methanol.”

Oxylus is currently owned by Bakas and his fellow co-founders. The company has been entirely grant funded to this point. DLA Piper is advising as the law firm on the seed capital raise.

“I think the most important thing about the technology is it’s the most energy-efficient pathway to making renewable methanol,” he said. “At the right energy prices, you’re below cost parity with fossil-derived methanol. When that happens, I think it’ll become a very interesting development scenario.”

Oxylus is focused on bringing the so-called green premium down to zero, Bakas said, noting that it requires achieving scale in electrolyzer production or partnering with established electrolyzer manufacturers.

Methanol for shipping

Oxylus will seek to introduce its technology into target markets that are already using methanol as a feedstock, like high-value petrochemicals. In the longer term, shipping and aviation are likely to become attractive markets. Taken together, the company believes methanol has the potential to decarbonize 11% of global emissions.

Methanol will compete with ammonia for primacy as a shipping fuel in the future, but Bakas believes methanol is the better option.

“These are massive markets – they need a lot of solutions, and quickly,” he said. “But ammonia is not energy dense, and it doesn’t integrate with existing infrastructure.”

The International Energy Agency recently projected that while ammonia will be cheaper to make, methanol is easier to handle, resulting in roughly similar cost profiles for e-methanol and green ammonia. The added cost for methanol production, the report found, is likely to come from a scarcity of biogenic CO2.

On that topic, Bakas acknowledged that the methanol pathway still requires combustion of carbon, but emphasized his technology’s ability to displace existing fossil fuel-based methanol production.

“The distinction we need to make is: are these virgin hydrocarbons or are they recycled hydrocarbons? If you’re just continuously pumping new CO2 out of the ground into the atmosphere, you’re gonna continue to cause climate change,” he said.

“The technologies that we are building in this suite of technologies that cover direct air capture, point source capture, carbon conversion, that whole CCUS world,” he added, “are really working to monitor and create a homeostasis in the atmospheric balance of CO2.”

Oxylus recently completed a lifecycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions, Bakas said, finding that its fuels are expected to reduce CO2 emissions by 95% at optimal voltage compared to natural gas steam methane reforming.

Unlock this article

The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.
To unlock this article:

You might also like...

Nevada plant on track for SAF production this year

The facility, which changed hands last year, is nearly through the conversion of a renewable diesel plant to sustainable aviation fuel production.

New Rise Renewables, a renewable energy company, today announced the inauguration its new 3200 barrel-per-day renewable sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) facility located at the Reno-Tahoe Industrial Complex in Storey County, Nevada.

The facility is nearly through the conversion of its existing renewable diesel plant as part of a groundbreaking effort to revolutionize the aviation industry by producing sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). It is scheduled to commence SAF production in the summer of 2024, according to a news release.

Camber Energy, a NYSE-traded energy company, last year reached a deal to acquire 100% of the interests in New Rise Renewables.

The plant was purchased for $499m, representing a purchase price of $750m less $251m of existing company liabilities, according to a securities filing. The seller was RESC Renewables Holdings, a predecessor company to Ryze Renewables, which developed the project.

The parties had reached a framework for the deal in late 2021, subject to purchase price adjustments and other closing conditions.

Reno-based Greater Commercial Lending (GCL) facilitated $112.6m in government-guaranteed credit for the development of New Rise Renewables Reno. Eighty percent of the GCL-arranged financing for New Rise Renewables Reno is guaranteed by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) via its 9003 Biorefinery, Renewable Chemical and Biodiesel Production Manufacturing Assistance Program. The financing structure includes participation by GCL parent Greater Nevada Credit Union, other credit unions, insurance companies and secondary market groups.

Read More »

Mote receives $1.2m for second biomass-to-H2 plant

Construction on a project in Bakersfield, California is expected to begin in 2025 and target full operational capacity by 2027.

Mote Inc. has received $1.2m in grant funding to establish its second biomass to hydrogen and carbon sequestration plant in partnership with the Sacramento Municipal Utility District, according to a news release.

As Mote’s hydrogen offtake partner for the second facility in Sacramento, SMUD and Mote have been collaborating on the project development. Upon completion, the facility would produce approximately 21,000 metric tons per year (MTPY) of carbon-negative hydrogen for use in thermal power generation and transportation.

The money comes from the US Forest Service, the California Department of Conservation, and the California Department of Forestry.

“Similar to its first project near Bakersfield, this second plant will integrate with carbon capture and geological sequestration methods to produce carbon-negative hydrogen,” the release states. “Mote can process woody waste from farms, forestry, and urban sources. The remaining carbon dioxide from the process is captured and permanently placed underground in saline aquifers for ecologically safe storage.”

Mote has received a formal invitation to submit a Part II application to the Department of Energy Loan Programs Office Title 17 Clean Energy Financing program, which can offer loan guarantees up to 80 percent of eligible project costs.

Bakersfield construction is expected to begin in 2025 and target full operational capacity by 2027.

Mote is a member of the ARCHES community and their application for the DOE’s Regional Clean Hydrogen Hub grant.

Read More »

HTEC to receive B.C. funding for hydrogen trucking pilot

HTEC will buy, test and demonstrate hydrogen-powered trucks for fleet operators throughout B.C.

HTEC is set to receive $16.5m in funding from British Columbia for a pilot program that uses hydrogen to power commercial trucking.

Under the pilot, B.C.-based hydrogen-energy company HTEC will procure six different heavy-duty fuel-cell trucks and complete upgrades to a hydrogen-fuelling station in Tsawwassen and a maintenance facility in Abbotsford.

The B.C. Pilot Hydrogen Truck Project aims to start the use of hydrogen in the commercial transportation sector, according to a news release.

Colin Armstrong, president and CEO of HTEC, said: “Through the Province’s significant investment in zero-emission trucks in B.C., and the simultaneous development of robust infrastructure to enhance their operations, this pilot project symbolizes a remarkable leap toward a sustainable future. It marks the first-ever deployment of heavy-duty hydrogen fuel-cell electric trucks for a diverse range of fleet operators in the province, a historic moment for the trucking industry. We applaud the provincial government for their vision and support, and we are delighted to be the wheels on the ground and driving force behind this groundbreaking project.”

HTEC designs, builds and operates hydrogen production facilities, infrastructure and supply.

HTEC will buy, test and demonstrate the hydrogen-powered trucks for fleet operators throughout B.C. The project also brings together Canada’s world-leading hydrogen and vehicle-technology companies. The Province’s funding for the pilot is being administered by the Innovative Clean Energy (ICE) Fund.

Read More »

Exclusive: Tenaska advancing 10 CCS projects

Independent power development company Tenaska is advancing a portfolio of more than 10 carbon capture and sequestration hubs across the US. We spoke with Bret Estep, who heads up the CCS strategy for the firm.

Tenaska, a Nebraska-based energy company, is advancing a portfolio of more than 10 carbon capture and sequestration projects in the US, Vice President Bret Estep said in an interview.

The portfolio includes three previously announced projects that are highly developed along with seven others that have not been publicly disclosed, Estep added. Tenaska is focused on the transport and storage aspects of the CCS value chain.

“Our base facility is 5 million metric tons per year of storage capacity, and then the necessary pipeline infrastructure to bring those emissions in,” he said.

The base facility design will cost approximately $500m to build, but varies depending on the land position, site geology, and required pipeline miles, Estep said.

“For us, as we plan, I generally use a big rule of thumb to say these are around $500m overnight cost projects,” he said. “Just the storage facility itself, you might be in the $250m to $400m range. And then in really difficult places where there are a lot of pipeline miles, and those are expensive pipeline miles, it might be another $200m or $300m of just pipe.”

Estep says that Tenaska, as a private company, has flexibility on the eventual financing structure for projects, but that project financing is an option. He said the company has held discussions with potential financial advisors but declined to comment further.

Tenaska’s three announced projects are the Longleaf CCS Hub in Mobile, Alabama; the Pineywoods CCS Hub in Houston; and the Tri-State CCS Hub in West Virginia, Ohio, and Pennsylvania.

According to Estep, additional projects are going forward in Corpus Christi, New Orleans/Baton Rouge, and Central Florida. Further inland, Tenaska has two projects in Dallas, another in Oklahoma and another in Indiana.

Finding emitters

The projects “are not all easy – there’s a lot of competition out there,” Estep said. “In some places like let’s say Houston, there are a lot of other folks around, but there’s also a lot of emissions around. So I think there’s room for many people to be successful here.”

In other places like Mobile, Alabama or the Tri-State project, which are harder to develop, Tenaska is the only CCS developer, he added. 

As an example, the West Virginia project will likely be more costly to develop, given the suboptimal geology of the region. Still, the project benefits from a $69m DOE grant to support geologic characterization and permitting for the site.

For its CCS business, Tenaska makes money through what Estep calls a “plain vanilla” version of transport and storage: the take-or-pay contract.

“The emitter installs the capture equipment, they’re the taxpayer of record – they have whatever commodity uplift or green premium they can get on their product,” he said. “And they simply need someone to transport and store that CO2 long term really to qualify for that 45Q” tax credit.

For the Longleaf CCS project in Mobile, Estep places potential customers into four quadrants. The first is existing emitters like steelmakers, power plants, gas processing and pharmaceutical companies. “There’s less project-on-project risk in that way.”

The second is blue molecules. “There’s a growing blue molecule effort in that part of the world,” he said. Quadrant three is combined cycle with capture (though Tenaska is not pursuing a combined cycle for Longleaf) and quadrant four is direct air capture.

Tenaska is a participant in the Southeast DAC Hub, led by Southern States Energy Board, which received a grant of over $10m from the DOE.

“We see many emitters across industries from gas processing to cement, steel, power gen, you name it,” Estep said. “They want to do their own capture, or they want to deal straight with a capture technology, an EPC, or a standalone capture-as-a-service provider. And then what they really want is someone to come to their fence line and take the CO2 and store it long term, durably, safely,” he added. “That’s what we do.”

‘Intercept problem’

Tenaska is still about a year away from beginning to order long lead time items like specialized metallurgy or pipe, but will begin putting in orders once it has more visibility on matching up its development timeline with that of its customers.

Early on, Estep and his teams were sprinting to acquire land positions and submit permits, including some Class VI permits from the EPA, which are under review. But “the script almost totally flips” at that point, because under Tenaska’s hub and spoke model, “we want to be optimized for customers,” he said.

The firm looks at permitting timelines and the earliest likelihood of construction and injection versus when the emitter will likely take FID and begin capturing, “which we call the intercept problem,” Estep said.

Tenaska is the 100% owner of the projects at this point, and Estep believes they have put together a unique portfolio, “in that it’s diversified by customer, it’s diversified by EPA region, it’s diversified by geology and state.”

Estep added: “These kind of assets where there’s geology and storage, they can go the power gen route, they can go the hard-to-decarbonize route, cement and steel, they can go the new power gen route that’s advanced, they can go direct air capture, they can go to the molecule.”

“It’s a really interesting set of infrastructure projects that we are very bullish on for that reason.”

Read More »

EXCLUSIVE: 8 Rivers co-founder departs firm

A co-founder and executive has departed the North Carolina-based firm, which recently announced an ammonia project in Texas.

Bill Brown, a co-founder of the technology commercialization firm and clean fuels developer 8 Rivers Capital, has retired from the company, a spokesperson confirmed via email.
According to Brown’s LinkedIn profile, he is serving now as CEO of New Waters Capital. He co-founded 8 Rivers and also served as CEO and CTO in this nearly 16 years there.
Brown did not respond to a request for comment.
According to 8 Rivers’ website, Dharmesh Patel is serving as interim CEO. The company recently announced development of the Cormorant Clean Energy ammonia production facility in Port Arthur, Texas
Read More »
exclusive

Siemens Energy NA executive priming for scale in hydrogen

The North American wing of the global technology company is in the earliest stages of engaging EPC providers and economic development officials for its next US electrolyzer manufacturing site, Richard Voorberg, president of Siemens Energy North America, said in an interview.

To say the demand for electrolyzer capacity has grown exponentially in 2022 comes across as an understatement, as customers in industry and energy have increased their orders multiple times over.

Siemens Energy North America’s electrolyzer – which is 18 MW and among the largest in the market – was too large for many customers just a year ago, Richard Voorberg, president of Siemens Energy North America, said in an interview. But following passage of the IRA, the question became how many the customer could get – and how fast.

“How quickly can I get 100 of your electrolyzers?” Voorberg said he hears now, whereas before that same customer might have asked for half an electrolyzer.

The decision to make an electrolyzer as large as 18 MW was part of the company’s strategy to have bigger capacity as the market for hydrogen expanded, Voorberg said.

HIF Global recently said it has tapped Siemens Energy to engineer and design their proprietary “Silyzer 300” electrolyzers to produce approximately 300,000 tons per year of green hydrogen at an eFuels facility in Texas.

Siemens Energy NA is now in the earliest stages of developing a new electrolyzer manufacturing plant in the United States, as previously reported by ReSource.

The US plant will be similar to the plant Siemens Energy is building in Berlin, and won’t be built until after Berlin is completed, Voorberg said.

The company is actively engaging with state economic development committees to scout locations, incentives and labor supplies. It is also in the early stages of engaging engineers, EPC providers and other development partners, Voorberg said.

“We also need to decide in the next few months what we want to do in-house, with our own shops, versus what we want to outsource,” Voorberg said.

North Carolina, Houston, Alabama and upstate New York are all in Siemens Energy’s existing footprint and are as such strong contenders for the new facility, Voorberg said, though nothing is set in stone as far as location. The company would finance the facility within its normal capex expenses within a year.

In electrolyzer manufacturing there is some “test hydrogen” that is produced, so there will be a need to find some small offtaker for that, Voorberg said. The company could also use it to supply its own fork-trucks in the future.

Open to acquisitions

Diving into an acquisition of another electrolyzer manufacturer probably would not make sense for Siemens Energy, Voorberg said. But the company is open to M&A.

He cited the acquisition of Airfoil Components in Florida as the type of deal that the company could move on again. In that case, the target company had expertise in casting that was easier to acquire than build from scratch.

“Does that make more sense that we buy it, that we outsource it, or should we be doing something like that ourselves?” Voorberg said are questions he often asks.

“When it comes to less complicated things, like a commodity market, that’s not something we play well in or need to play well in,” Voorberg said. “When it comes to a specialty design-type product, that’s where we at Siemens Energy shine.”

Right now, the Siemens Energy parent company has a bid out to acquire the third of Siemens Gamesa, the Spanish-listed wind engineering company, that it does not own, Voorberg noted.

Start-up opportunity

Siemens Energy, through its in-house venture capital group and partnerships with US universities, is interested in helping technology startups scale, Voorberg said.

“We can play in between them and the customers and do the introductions and potentially even partner in with some of our technology,” he said.

The company keeps close relationships with incubators at Georgia Tech and the University of Central Florida, among others, Voorberg said.

Equity investments will be made through the VC group, Voorberg said, noting that effort as one that is strategic in growing the energy transition, rather than financial.

Additional non-equity partnerships, similar to the fellowship with the Bill Gates-founded Breakthrough Energy, are on the table as well.

Read More »

Welcome Back

Get Started

Sign up for a free 15-day trial and get the latest clean fuels news in your inbox.